Peak Oil News: Oil Depletion: Obama Faces Hard Political Decisions

Tuesday, November 11, 2008

Oil Depletion: Obama Faces Hard Political Decisions

The Cultural Economist


By Ronald R. Cooke


Washington insiders are well aware of oil depletion. It has been the subject of at least four reports funded by the United States Government, more than a dozen books, and multiple independent reports. Congress has taken testimony. Key figures in Washington have made speeches. Although there are some differences in the details, they are trivial in comparison with the broader perspective.

It is highly probable that oil demand will exceed oil supply within the next 10 years.

If you buy heating oil, propane, gasoline, or diesel fuel, you have already become a victim of oil depletion. Fuel prices are up. And they are up because the supply of oil failed to keep up with the growing demand for oil. That led to greed driven speculation. Oil prices over $140 a barrel. Then speculators discovered recessionary forces were driving down the demand for oil. Fear immediately replaced greed. The price of oil declined. Fast.

But do not be fooled by this temporary decline in the price you pay for fuels. OPEC will curtail production until demand picks up again. The fundamental trends have not changed. The supply of oil will not keep up with the demand for oil. Higher prices and shortages are in your future.

The Washington establishment’s failure to acknowledge oil depletion is not one of ignorance. It has been a matter of political expediency. Politicians prefer to avoid bad news. Depletion means higher prices and possible shortages. Depletion adds confusion to the problems of global warming. Depletion lends support to America’s presence in Iraq. Acknowledging oil depletion creates additional stress for our political system.

Yes. Oil depletion creates a real political dilemma for Barack Obama. If he acknowledges oil depletion – Peak Oil – then he will be expected to do something about it. In order to do so, Barack will have to challenge embedded political philosophy. He will have to find a way to change public opinion without causing a political crisis for the Democrats.

It will not be easy. Acknowledging oil depletion means finding more oil resources to keep our economy going. Shortages must be avoided. Put a lid on prices. Drill everywhere. No sacred environmental cows such as ANWR or the Santa Barbra channel. Make deals for oil with whomever is in charge of the big oil nations. Control the political outcome in the Middle East. Stay in Iraq to protect America’s interests. More tough choices. High political risk.

But if Barack ignores oil depletion, then what? He runs the risk of cataclysmic failure . Why? Because it is highly likely that sometime – during his administration - shortages and high prices will decimate America’s economy. That means high unemployment. Out of control inflation. Voters will be mad as hell. Why – they will ask – did you let this happen to us?

Would Barack be less popular than George Bush? Doing nothing has its own risks.

So. What to do? Barack faces hard political decisions. Oil depletion will force his hand. One way – or the other. In the spirit of being constructive, here are four suggestions:

1. Take an integrated approach to contemporary concerns about global warming and fossil fuel depletion. Global warming and fossil fuel depletion are in fact evil twins, and if we want to make intelligent choices, we need to deal with them as a package.
2. Persuade national leaders to form an oil and natural gas consumer’s union. Start with the United States, Canada, and the European Union. Invite China and India. This will give consuming nations the leverage needed to deal with supplier cartels, and – hopefully – lead to resource sharing agreements.
3. Find a way to deal with the Middle East. These nations have most of the world’s remaining deposits of cheap oil. For the sake of world peace, we must control the outcome.
4. Create a credible energy program. One with strong management, specific objectives, adequate funding, and a time line for accomplishment. Include public policy initiatives that promote conservation and the evolution of energy conscious life styles.

There is a very long list of potential initiatives Barack could implement. Sorting through them will test his wisdom and political courage. But try he must. Oil depletion is a challenge that will not go away.


3 Comments:

At 10:40 AM, November 11, 2008, Blogger Clifford J. Wirth, Ph.D. said...

Neither the president nor Congress will know what to do with this catastrophe, and they are heavily influenced by interest groups and public opinion, both of whom want more jobs and consumerism and business as usual.
Soon, Peak Oil will present the nation with continuing crises that require hard decisions. It is better to base decisions on scientific study than on interest groups pressures.
Common sense tells us that there must be energy alternatives, and that is what we all want. But alternatives yield electric power, which is not what we need for tractors/combines, 18 wheel trucks, trains, and ships and for heating oil. Algal biodiesel is in the early R&D phase and 20 years and trillions of dollars away from delivering a cubic mile of oil annually -- if it is feasible.
Many believe that electric power can provide transportation and power for heating. But my exhaustive analysis of available scientific studies indicates that the electric economy will not work without ample supplies of oil. The nation could waste much time and investment on developing alternatives, only to find out later that they can't provide the energy required.
Without ample oil, we are facing the collapse of the highways that depend on diesel trucks for maintenance of bridges, cleaning culverts to avoid road washouts, snow plowing, roadbed and surface repair. When the highways fail, so will the power grid, as highways carry the parts, transformers, steel for pylons, and high tension cables, all from far away. With the highways out, there will be no food coming in from "outside," and without the power grid virtually nothing works, including home heating, pumping of gasoline and diesel, airports, communications, and automated systems.
The National Academy of Sciences is the only source that can provide unbiased and authoritative answers to these questions, and it is the only source that has the stature and credibility to advise the president and Congress.
It is time to prepare for Peak Oil impacts. But it will take the NAS to get us there. Currently, there is little study or effort toward planning for the day when there will be no oil and no electric power. That time is coming sooner than many realize, The Last Power Blackout.

This is documented in a free 48 page report that can be downloaded, website posted, distributed, and emailed: http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html

I used to live in NH-USA, but moved to a sustainable place. Anyone interested in relocating to a nice, pretty, sustainable area with a good climate and good soil? Email: clifford dot wirth at yahoo dot com or give me a phone call which operates here as my old USA-NH number 603-668-4207. http://survivingpeakoil.blogspot.com/

 
At 5:32 PM, November 12, 2008, Blogger Roy Manseras said...

Hi, this is very interesting. I hope you would continue this advocate to spread your good news. By the way, I have a site which offers Free E-Books for computers, programming, cooking lessons, sexy magazines and so much more. Please visit my Free E-Book Downloads website. Thanks.

 
At 12:24 AM, November 25, 2008, Blogger Jean d'Auriac said...

Obama looks very brilliant and clever. But like any other head of state in the world, he will be powerless if it appears that our world has reached or is about to reach its growth’s ultimate limits, within an economic system in which all problems can only be solved by perpetuating growth.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home